Wednesday, 15 April 2015

Why You Should Migrate From Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013

If your organization has been planning to migrate to Office 365, then there is a convincing reason that it offers users a benefit of unlimited storage space.

However you will experience many obstructions in your path to making this an actuality. These might consist of risks to data control; lack of control over the rigorous speed of upgrades; negotiations to the capability to incorporate business applications; or possibly loss of the capability to answer to service concerns without waiting for a third party.

Whether you are continuing with on-premises Exchange for the predictable prospect or just waiting until you feel Exchange Online is set, it makes logic to follow Microsoft's lead and update your Exchange organization. Here are 3 ways you can achieve this.

1: You can streamline your Exchange infrastructure

Once you upgrade to Exchange Server 2013, you will get a good prospect to condense your Exchange footprint. The number of roles required to install Exchange 2013 has been decreased and Microsoft recommends installing Exchange Server as a multi-role server.

If your Exchange 2010 setup consists of dedicated servers for unified messaging (UM), or if you have divided the Hub Transport and Client Access roles from the mailbox servers, you should combine the number of servers you make use of, which would comprise organizations which are running on virtual infrastructure with some united Hub Transport and Client Access servers. With this, unified messaging servers and a two-node Database Availability Group can cut down seven or more Exchange 2010 servers to just two Exchange 2013 servers.

For multi-site placements, you can also streamline your Exchange setup. A distinctive situation, for example, would be a two-site setup that has a disaster recovery site along with a main site. With Exchange 2010 Server, many Client Access arrays, major and minor site HTTPS namespaces, and failback & failover HTTPS namespaces mean your disaster recovery plans are too complex. With an upgrade to Exchange 2013 Server, you don’t need to worry about outdated RPC Client Access array, and you can even use a single HTTPS namespace to easy failback & failover.

2: You can upgrade to Exchange 2013 to make better use of current hardware or aid a move to low cost infrastructure.

One of the main USP of Exchange Server 2010 was the compact disk output requirements, and because of which Exchange 2010 could even run on a slow SATA within virtual environments, as the mailbox role didn't stress the fundamental storage as much as compared to earlier versions.

If you still have plans to run with your present infrastructure for few more years, then you can even stretch your storage infrastructure further with an upgrade to Exchange 2013.

There were comparatively limited Exchange 2010 deployments with the help of JBOD for running Exchange Server without RAID storage because of the complex controlling it involves after it is installed.

With Exchange 2013, Microsoft has introduced new Automatic Reseed features, which made it possible to swap disks as easy as using RAID storage. And because of which, you could halve the number of disks you are using at present and return a large amount of storage to your virtual infrastructure or arrange for a significant increase in mailbox allocations.

If you are an initial adopter of Exchange Server 2010, then your hardware will likely becoming five-year old by the next year. Rather than substitute it with more of the similar or virtualize it. You can cut costs by making use of inexpensive servers with a lesser number of large disks. This frequently means substituting large, power-consuming peripheral arrays with smaller rack servers that require a lesser number of integrated disks to upkeep the same set of users.

3: Using the Managed Availability feature can aid you worry less about keeping the lights on.

Majority of the Exchange environments run with nominal interference as long as they are examined to some degree and reorganized. But whatever thing you can carry out to make running your Exchange server worry-free is a gratuity.

It is in Microsoft's top interest when running Exchange online to ensure it is as low-maintenance as potential. Those advantages from the cloud directly help Exchange 2013 installations, mainly with the help of a feature called Managed Availability.

Exchange 2013 has an integrated engine to keep an eye over the environment and execute remedial actions, for example - restarting failed services or ensuring important services acquire the correct resources etc. When something critically fails, Managed Availability delivers the right hooks for exterior systems like load balancers. This assists in recognizing where failure happened, regulates actions accordingly and makes sure that end users don’t get affected.

Lastly, Systems Center Operations Manager (SCOM) administrators get a dual advantage. The signals that Systems Center Operations Manager administrators produces through the above networks rather than via SCOM agents means the signals are more dedicated and use less resources on your SCOM servers.


Post a Comment